Ethans Law

Governor Ned Lamont signing Ethans Law in Guilford Thursday. 

You could certainly be forgiven if you thought Ethans Law, recently signed into law by Governor Ned Lamont and hailed as another step in ending gun violence, was only about gun storage. The law is a direct response to a tragedy in Guilford where the owner of the firearm in question was unable to be charged with a crime because the gun was not loaded. Under the law, the gun owner in question would have been arrested and charged with a crime.

The passage of the bill was an emotional one, notably for the parents of the boy, who are well known in Guilford and now, statewide. The community rallied around the family, and there was universal anger when state police announced the gun owner would not be charged with a crime due to current law. This law, Ethans Law, would solve that.

Almost all of the quotes from elected officials mention this aspect of the law. Governor Lamont stated “laws that require gun owners to safely store firearms and ammunition in a manner that prevents minors from accessing them are commonsense and have near universal support, including among gun owners.” State representative Sean Scanlon the laws sponsor agreed, stating that “ensuring that all firearms are safety stored and inaccessible to minors is common sense and working with the Song family to introduce and pass Ethan’s Law has been one of the greatest honors of not only my public service but my entire life. State senator Christine Cohen echoed similar sentiments.

That’s great. But there is one small problem with the focus on a legal technicality. That aspect of the law may save lives. Another aspect of the law will save far more, if properly implemented and supported with the same energy that Lamont and Scanlon and Cohen have shown with the criminal aspect.

The bill mandates that the state Board of Education create a gun safety curriculum and that municipalities then will have the option to add that curriculum locally. More gun education has typically been the talking point of the right, the left has focused on tougher gun laws overall.

But both are needed. And that the proponents of Ethan’s Law are largely ignoring this aspect is troubling.

Students learning the dangers of drugs and alcohol is already commonplace, and in often graphic, shocking ways. Especially around prom season, when alcohol related incidents and deaths are more frequent, schools have gone to drastic measures to show the consequences of alcohol abuse, showing pictures, demonstrations, and in some cases, dropping vehicles from 3-4 stories high to show the impacts of a collision.

But unlike alcohol, most children touch their first toy firearm, in some manner, well before 5 years old. Toy guns are common, and the violence they are responsible for is presented in a cartoonish way, typically devoid of any semblance of the real impact of gun violence. And this is repeated in thousands of tv shows and movies children see constantly, almost from infancy. This won’t change anytime soon, no matter what more restrictive laws anti-gun advocates see passed.

At no time in history, when children spend years being desensitized to the impacts of firearms, has gun education been more needed in the school system. And with the law leaving it up to local school systems to implement, each town will have a choice on implementing this curriculum and therefore implementing the full text of Ethans Law.

But for that to happen, the curriculum needs to be adopted in schools. Even  schools in districts that lean left, or want to pretend that teaching gun safety may be pushing a “gun culture” on students, will have to see past the politics and realize this is a viable way to decrease gun violence, and deaths. 

We live in a country that has, like it or not, 400,000,000 guns. They are not going away. We teach alcohol safety, vehicle safety, food safety; we even teach water safety. We accept that teaching safety in these areas works, it literally saves lives. We also need to accept the reality that guns exist and for students to truly be safer, teaching gun safety will have a far greater impact on that goal than changing who can be criminally charged in certain gun storage situations.

But for this to happen, Lamont, Scanlon and Cohen need to continue the advocacy. They need to be the ones to push the curriculum, and hold the same press conferences with Boards of Education as they adopt this very curriculum in each and every school district.

So far, all of the public statements have been on one aspect of the law, the portion loved by the left.  But to truly impact the lives of children, the same lawmakers must publicly, and eagerly, support the entire law and not rest until schools actually adopt the gun safety curriculum portion of Ethans Law.

(17) comments


The gun that Ethan Song used to commit suicide was safely stored. It was locked and unloaded.


that is true but it was discovered while the gun was locked, (Im assuming a trigger lock) the keys were stored next the gun which defeats the purpose


It was an accidental death, not a suicide.


He unlocked the lock on the gun, loaded the gun, pointed at his head and pulled the trigger. That is not an accident, I call that suicide.


It was an accidental gun death, not a suicide.


It all depends on the philosophy of the person teaching the course. No course can prevent stupid people from making stupid decisions. Playing Russian Roulette is a fool's errand. Ad hominem legislation is nothing but a salve for foolish people.


Hey, if it makes people feel good and does not solve the problem...that is what being a democrat is all about. Feel good, do nothing laws.


Will the last person to leave CT, please turn the lights off.


Silly post. The lights will have been turned off well before the last person leaves, due to a failure to pay the electric bill because the state ran out of money.


I'm curious: why did the editor feel that he had to add right/left language to his otherwise excellent editorial? This law had non partisan support in the legislature. The majority of voters in CT, Democrat and Republican, supported it. Why not celebrate our unity?

Steve Mazzacane Staff
Steve Mazzacane

In the third paragraph we provide 3 Democrats who put out press releases after the signing, all praised one aspect of the law while not mentioning the education aspect. The education aspect has had wide Republican support for years. The hope is that the Democrats legislators will continue to support the law, all aspects of the law, including the education aspect, a law they are now praising.


Therein lies the potential problem. Democrats love anti-gun laws. They loathe anything that deals with using guns in a safe manner. The only gun information Democrats approve of is hostile toward guns and their owners. If a child happens to eats pop tart and by chance the pop tart appears to resemble a gun as the child bites it, that child is considered to be a risk to his classmates and is suspended. (This actually happened.) Teaching gun safety is not part of the democrats philosophy. We must be hopeful that our democrat run state will actually enforce the educational based gun safety provisions. My fear is that they will simply ignore those provisions and continue to pass ad hominem legislation that does nothing to solve problems. Putting a loaded gun to your head and pulling the trigger is an act that defies any and all legislation to the contrary.


Sorry. Should read: eat a pop tart


Judith, thank you for your post and your question. Rather than do nothing, the Songs became proactive and in Hartford both the left and right responded. We in CT have some smart gun laws, sadly much of the rest of the country does not. I am a GVP advocate, (Gun Violence Prevention) and the number of children killing siblings, friends, or cousins in this country is horrifying. With CT as an example, I have hope that Ethan's Law will become the law of the nation. We in the US suffer from gun violence at levels unknown to the rest of the world and yet factions of our citizens and the senate have nothing to offer than "thoughts and prayers". While this piece is well intended, it's the same old we/they, left/right, D/R drivel and that's why people continue to die. Steve if education is your thing, get involved, make something happen, change the norm. If you succeed like the Songs did for their son Ethan, it will make you feel good and you will be contributing to the common good. Consider it, please.


Such lofty thoughts. A small fraction of gun owners (illegally possessing firearms) is responsible for the vast majority of gun deaths. Eliminate a few democrat controlled cities and our gun death rate is much lower. Emotional reactions don't solve problems.


The real problem with the death of Ethan is that the police let their buddy, the father/homeowner, off the hook and didn't charge him. Must be nice having friends on the force.


How about a discussion of parents parenting? The Songs had a huge responsibility here. Their son was 15 years old when he died. The parents had significant time to educate their son about using guns and educating him about what he should not do. Why did Ethan have to handle those guns? Legislative laws are not a substitute for responsible parenting.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.