Parkside Revised Plan

The Parkside development project on Montowese may be headed back to the town legislature for additional votes or a change to the application, as the applicants, the Branford Housing Authority and Beacon Communities, the developer on the project, take issue with a stipulation in the approval granted last month.

The question is largely over whether or not the towns legislative body, the Representative Town Meeting, needs to sign off on providing access to town property by the developers.

In the approval, it is stipulated that before any construction work can commence, the developers need to acquire a “construction easement or alternative legal instrument” to allow use of town property for staging equipment and temporary parking while widening Sliney Road.

The approval also stipulates that a Certificate of Occupancy can only be granted after, among other things, “evidence of the recording on the Branford Town Clerks land records of an executed Deed Restriction, or equivalent legal instrument approved by the town counsel….prohibiting any building or physical modifications..” in certain designated areas, notably where emergency parking is detailed.

Essentially, the stipulation is that the town issue a Deed Restricting, ensuring that portions of town property can never be developed or used in any other manner.

To acquire this, however, the town charter requires approval by the towns legislative body, the RTM.

The town code reads, in section 73.3, that “No Town agency, Town officer or the Board of Selectmen shall acquire, sell, lease, mortgage, abandon, gift, transfer or encumber in any manner real property of the Town until such action has been approved by a majority vote of the members of the R.T.M.”

A deed restriction preventing any future action on the property would be an encumbrance, and require RTM approval.

But such approval from the RTM is unlikely.

Previously, an approval was contingent on Beacon and the BHA getting RTM approval for a Melrose Road access, which the RTM denied. It is highly likely the RTM would deny such a request in this case as well.

It makes little sense for the RTM to approve any deed restriction for property which may be developed in the future or sold to a private entity.

The makeup of the RTM plays a crucial role here as well. While the Republicans control a majority of the RTM, Democrats on the body have been mixed when it comes to affordable housing applications: they were unanimously against building affordable housing at the former Branford Hills School site, but very in favor of this project in Indian Neck, despite resident opposition.

However, in that Melrose Access vote, the lone Democrat who represents the district, Maryanne Hall, voted against. She is no longer on the RTM.

Also voting no is current state representative Robin Comey, who was on the RTM at the time and running for the state seat being vacated by Lonnie Reed. She won the seat, and is no longer on the RTM.

Attorney Tim Hollister, who represents Beacon Communities, has requested clarification of the stipulation, and the matter will be discussed at this weeks Planning and Zoning Commission. The meeting will by Thursday evening at 7 PM at the Branford Firehouse.


(5) comments


Elitists who go to church every Sunday to Pray for those less fortunate, as long as they dont live in their town.




Indian Neck is not an elitist neighborhood. The elitists are the people pushing this project, and none of them live anywhere near public housing. BHA, Beacon Properties, the group from Yale, all promoting social engineering, as long as it's not in their elitist neighborhoods.


Here is the reality of the Parkside Project as proposed by Beacon Communities: This out of State "for profit" corporation will displace 50 of the poorest most needy residents in our town and construct a oversized building that can accommodate approximately 200 residents who can afford to pay a much higher rents than the current residents. All this will be done on town property that Beacon will not pay for nor will they be taxed (property tax) for 99 years. Who is the real winner in this deal and who are the victims? Lastly, this behemoth project is being put in the middle of a small quiet residential neighborhood that works well with the current Parkside residents.

Asiseeit, all great points, one-note the property is owned by the Housing Authority, not the town. Yes, it's the Branford Housing Authority , just a name like Branford Motel, just a name. I will continue to be a NO for this project as presented. We need to keep a place that is permantly for the Senior/Disabled Low income population. This project will eliminate that access over time. The short-cut to Affordable housing lines the pockets of the developers.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.